Spider-Man Reboot Gets Title: The Amazing Spider-Man

spider-man

The frist spider-man was the best i love the frist spider-man now it suck because the put a new spider-man.

Spidy-Man

You're right Kaching. U are all right. This is no moive, its a desease to the children if the world!
Goto run..........

Spider-Man Apped

Our favorite hero is begin appped from behind, and the compnay doesn't even care. Who's idea was this: The compnay or Stans? I like Stan Lee as the next guy, but if it was his deciosn, as it was to go ahead for Disney, i am very sadden indeed. But don't you gusy think its werid, that they would "reboot this" and call it: The Amazing-Spider-Man"? No. Okay, maybe it's jsut me then.

Well my theroy is that: Sony and the rest, waited until Sam Raimi, had a bad idea for Spider-Man 4, so they did the least good-thing that could be done and that was reboot it. Then after that, they need a new director and producer so they went with somebody the fans of Spider-Man, would have never heard of: Webb. Kind of quinecental don't you think? A spider shots webs, his last name is Webb with two "BB's" and then came the ideal of a new cast. "Who do we get to play: The Amazing Spider-Man?" "Oh i know who," says Avriad, "after we see a bunch a guys performe for the role of Spider-Man, we'll give them the "big SCREW YOU" and we'll cast someone that nobody has heard of. Oh and wait, he has to be skinny like Parker, but wait Parker has muscles; who cares he'll fit." And so they hired who else: Andrew Garfield as Peter PArker and then later on Emma Stone as: Gwen Stacy.

They didn't care, if they runied the great hero, that Spider-Man is! Well if your listneing or reading this: Sony and everyone else part of the project of the ideal reboot: It wasn't your time to dine in Spider-Man! Garfiled is toooo old and doesn't look like Parker and Emma...well Emma, she i don't know about her yet, but all i am saying now is: That this will be a waist of film, time, nights and days; and evretyhing else that was put in the remake. Stupid people, i swear if i was in charge, i wouldn't even done this, i would've chose a different Spidy from a different year.

?

the costume sucks and the new spider-man sucks. the first spider-man was the best one ever sony sucks there stupid!!!!!! stan ley was the best tooooooooo he made the whole marvel HES A LEGEND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

spidey

Having the mechanical web shooters is just a plot device, it was in the comics and it will now be in the movie. Something silly to focus on, and waste film on.

Having the web shooters being a part of his body, contributes to his uniqueness. If you want to make it interesting have the web shooters as a part of him, but given the stress and strain he is under he can only generate a certain amount of webbing. You have your plot device along with a bit of emotion.

• your stupid

  Spiderclaw | 04.01.11 06:15:40 PM

  The mechanical shooters are a part of his character, switching back means getting back to the source, thus a good thing. I will say it once more... you are stupid.

  Reply | Report Abuse

  

  Review Rating: 0

Spider-Man Already

The title "The Amazing Spider-Man" was used in the very offical Spider-Man comic book, where Peter Benjamin Parker as known as the "Amazing Spider-Man today; where he learned to use his new found powers for good and not evil.

For the movie, well that was the title of the 1st one, but it it was hidden. Sure we didn't see it, but the title would be used, when he furhur develpoed his abilites as Spideer-Man.

spider man

his hands look dumb.
why are his eyes yellow ???

spider man compared to x men first class

first class looks WAY BETTER than spider man

spider man

The name is good but the costume looks wierd!

• spider man

  max | 02.14.11 07:56:52 PM

  the costume is FINE!!

  Reply | Report Abuse

  

  Review Rating: 0

amazing spider man

I think its a great name

• amazing spider man

  max | 02.14.11 07:53:35 PM

  I like it

  Reply | Report Abuse

  

  Review Rating: 0